Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 vs Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · OLEDSamsung Odyssey G6 G60F
27″ · 2560×1440 · 350 Hz · Fast IPS · 2025Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 and Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 88.
- Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F leads (350 Hz vs 240 Hz).
- Response time: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 leads (0.03 ms vs 1 ms).
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240
If you care most about response time.
Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 | Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F | |
|---|---|---|
| 89 | Gear score | 88 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 350 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Release year | 2025 |
| ≈ $1,080 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 or Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F better?
Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 and Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 88. Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F leads (350 Hz vs 240 Hz). Response time: Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 leads (0.03 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey G6 G60F leads (350 Hz vs 240 Hz).