Monitors / Comparison

Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27HG612

Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 27QHD240

27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · OLED
GEAR SCORE 89.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution80
Panel100
Response time100
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27HG612

27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · OLED
GEAR SCORE 88.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution80
Panel100
Verdict

Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 and Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27HG612 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 88.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair XENEON 27QHD240Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27HG612
89Gear score88
27″Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
240 HzRefresh rate240 Hz
OLEDPanelOLED
0.03 msResponse time—
≈ $1,080Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 or Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27HG612 better?

Corsair XENEON 27QHD240 and Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27HG612 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 89 and 88.