Monitors / Comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs Razer Raptor 27

Monitor · Corsair

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165

32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 74.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time69
VS
Monitor · Razer

Razer Raptor 27

27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 73.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time60
Verdict

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Razer Raptor 27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 73.

  • Response time: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165Razer Raptor 27
74Gear score73
32″Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate165 Hz
IPSPanelIPS
3 msResponse time4 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 or Razer Raptor 27 better?

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 and Razer Raptor 27 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 73. Response time: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).

Similar comparisons

Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs ASUS ROG Strix XG17AHPCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 244FCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 275CQRF-QDCorsair XENEON 32QHD165 vs MSI MAG 325CQRF-QDRazer Raptor 27 vs Corsair XENEON 32UHD144Razer Raptor 27 vs Corsair XENEON ​32UHD144-ARazer Raptor 27 vs ASUS PG279Q ROG SwiftRazer Raptor 27 vs ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279QZRazer Raptor 27 vs ASUS ROG Swift PG65UQ