Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C vs Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602
Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C
34″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · QD-OLEDSamsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602
27″ · 2560×1440 · 360 Hz · OLEDCorsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C and Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 91 and 92.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602 leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602 | |
|---|---|---|
| 91 | Gear score | 92 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 360 Hz |
| QD-OLED | Panel | OLED |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $900 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C or Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602 better?
Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C and Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 91 and 92. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602 leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 S27DG602 leads (360 Hz vs 240 Hz).