Monitors / Comparison
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 vs LG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W
Monitor · Corsair
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240
45″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · OLEDTop tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution88
Panel100
Response time100
VS
Monitor · LG
LG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W
39″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · OLEDTop tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution88
Panel100
Response time100
Verdict
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 and LG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 91 and 91.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 | LG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 91 | Gear score | 91 |
| 45″ | Screen size | 39″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | OLED |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| ≈ $1,100 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 or LG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W better?
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 and LG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 91 and 91.
Similar comparisons
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 vs Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-CCorsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDMCorsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG39WCDMCorsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 vs ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG34WCDMTGCorsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 vs MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLED X28LG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W vs Corsair XENEON 34WQHD240-CLG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG34WCDMLG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG39WCDMLG UltraGear OLED 39GS95QE-W vs ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG34WCDMTG