Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 vs Samsung LS32BG850NMXUE
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240
45″ · 3440×1440 · 240 Hz · OLEDSamsung LS32BG850NMXUE
32″ · 3840×2160 · 240 HzCorsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 and Samsung LS32BG850NMXUE are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 91 and 92.
- Resolution: Samsung LS32BG850NMXUE leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Response time: Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 leads (0.03 ms vs 1 ms).
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240
If you care most about response time.
Samsung LS32BG850NMXUE
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 | Samsung LS32BG850NMXUE | |
|---|---|---|
| 91 | Gear score | 92 |
| 45″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | — |
| 0.03 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $1,100 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 or Samsung LS32BG850NMXUE better?
Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 and Samsung LS32BG850NMXUE are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 91 and 92. Resolution: Samsung LS32BG850NMXUE leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Response time: Corsair XENEON FLEX 45WQHD240 leads (0.03 ms vs 1 ms).