Crossover 34U100 vs LG 24GQ50F-B
Crossover 34U100
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · PVALG 24GQ50F-B
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VACrossover 34U100 and LG 24GQ50F-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 62 and 62.
- Resolution: Crossover 34U100 leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 24GQ50F-B leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: Crossover 34U100 leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
Crossover 34U100
If you care most about resolution, response time.
LG 24GQ50F-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Crossover 34U100 | LG 24GQ50F-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 62 | Gear score | 62 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| PVA | Panel | VA |
| 3 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $195 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Crossover 34U100 or LG 24GQ50F-B better?
Crossover 34U100 and LG 24GQ50F-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 62 and 62. Resolution: Crossover 34U100 leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG 24GQ50F-B leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: Crossover 34U100 leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 24GQ50F-B leads (165 Hz vs 100 Hz).