Eizo CX241-BK-CN vs Samsung S32E590C
Eizo CX241-BK-CN
24.1″ · 1920×1200 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung S32E590C
31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAEizo CX241-BK-CN and Samsung S32E590C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 43 and 42.
- Resolution: Eizo CX241-BK-CN leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080).
- Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Eizo CX241-BK-CN
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung S32E590C
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Eizo CX241-BK-CN | Samsung S32E590C | |
|---|---|---|
| 43 | Gear score | 42 |
| 24.1″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Eizo CX241-BK-CN or Samsung S32E590C better?
Eizo CX241-BK-CN and Samsung S32E590C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 43 and 42. Resolution: Eizo CX241-BK-CN leads (1920×1200 vs 1920×1080). Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).