Eizo MX210-BK vs LG W1943SS-PF
Eizo MX210-BK
21″ · 1600×1200 · 60 HzLG W1943SS-PF
18.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 Hz · TNEizo MX210-BK and LG W1943SS-PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 30 and 29.
- Resolution: Eizo MX210-BK leads (1600×1200 vs 1366×768).
- Response time: LG W1943SS-PF leads (5 ms vs 16 ms).
Eizo MX210-BK
If you care most about resolution.
LG W1943SS-PF
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Eizo MX210-BK | LG W1943SS-PF | |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | Gear score | 29 |
| 21″ | Screen size | 18.5″ |
| 1600×1200 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| — | Panel | TN |
| 16 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Eizo MX210-BK or LG W1943SS-PF better?
Eizo MX210-BK and LG W1943SS-PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 30 and 29. Resolution: Eizo MX210-BK leads (1600×1200 vs 1366×768). Response time: LG W1943SS-PF leads (5 ms vs 16 ms).