Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD vs MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD
Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 325CQRF-QD
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VAGigabyte AORUS AD27QD and MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD | MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD or MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD better?
Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD and MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).