Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q vs MSI MAG 255F E20
Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 255F E20
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Rapid IPSGigabyte AORUS FI27Q and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255F E20
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q | MSI MAG 255F E20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Rapid IPS |
| — | Response time | 0.5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q or MSI MAG 255F E20 better?
Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).