Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X vs MSI MPG 274URF QD
Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · IPSMSI MPG 274URF QD
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSGigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X and MSI MPG 274URF QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 83 and 82.
- Resolution: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X
If you care most about refresh rate.
MSI MPG 274URF QD
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X | MSI MPG 274URF QD | |
|---|---|---|
| 83 | Gear score | 82 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 160 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $375 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X or MSI MPG 274URF QD better?
Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X and MSI MPG 274URF QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 83 and 82. Resolution: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz). Response time: MSI MPG 274URF QD leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI27Q-X leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz).