Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X vs LG UltraGear 27G640A-B
Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X
32″ · 2560×1440 · 270 Hz · IPSLG UltraGear 27G640A-B
27″ · 2560×1440 · 300 Hz · IPSGigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X and LG UltraGear 27G640A-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85.
- Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27G640A-B leads (300 Hz vs 270 Hz).
LG UltraGear 27G640A-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X | LG UltraGear 27G640A-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 85 | Gear score | 85 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 270 Hz | Refresh rate | 300 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X or LG UltraGear 27G640A-B better?
Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X and LG UltraGear 27G640A-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85. Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27G640A-B leads (300 Hz vs 270 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27G640A-B leads (300 Hz vs 270 Hz).