Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X vs MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16
Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X
32″ · 2560×1440 · 270 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16
26.5″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · OLEDGigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X and MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 86.
- Resolution: MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X leads (270 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X
If you care most about refresh rate.
MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X | MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 | |
|---|---|---|
| 85 | Gear score | 86 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 26.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 270 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X or MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 better?
Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X and MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 86. Resolution: MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X leads (270 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte AORUS FI32Q-X leads (270 Hz vs 165 Hz).