Gigabyte AORUS FI32U vs MSI MAG 255PXF
Gigabyte AORUS FI32U
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 255PXF
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 300 Hz · Rapid IPSGigabyte AORUS FI32U and MSI MAG 255PXF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79.
- Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FI32U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (300 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Gigabyte AORUS FI32U
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255PXF
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte AORUS FI32U | MSI MAG 255PXF | |
|---|---|---|
| 80 | Gear score | 79 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 300 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Rapid IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte AORUS FI32U or MSI MAG 255PXF better?
Gigabyte AORUS FI32U and MSI MAG 255PXF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79. Resolution: Gigabyte AORUS FI32U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (300 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (300 Hz vs 144 Hz).