Monitors / Comparison

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 vs LG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B

Monitor · Gigabyte

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2

31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 240 Hz · OLED
GEAR SCORE 95.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution100
Panel100
Response time100
VS
Monitor · LG

LG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B

32″ · 3840×2160 · 240 Hz · OLED
GEAR SCORE 95.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution100
Panel100
Response time100
Verdict

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 and LG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2LG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B
95Gear score95
31.5″Screen size32″
3840×2160Resolution3840×2160
240 HzRefresh rate240 Hz
OLEDPanelOLED
0.03 msResponse time0.03 ms
≈ $950Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 or LG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B better?

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 and LG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.

Similar comparisons

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 vs ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMGGigabyte AORUS FO32U2 vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDMGigabyte AORUS FO32U2 vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDMGigabyte AORUS FO32U2 vs MSI MAG 321UPX QD-OLEDGigabyte AORUS FO32U2 vs MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLEDLG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B vs ASUS ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMGLG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDMLG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B vs ASUS ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDMLG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B vs MSI MAG 321UPX QD-OLEDLG UltraGear OLED 32GX870A-B vs MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED