Gigabyte M27F vs LG 38CB99-W
LG 38CB99-W
38″ · 3840×1600 · 75 Hz · IPSGigabyte M27F and LG 38CB99-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59.
- Resolution: LG 38CB99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27F leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).
Gigabyte M27F
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 38CB99-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte M27F | LG 38CB99-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 59 | Gear score | 59 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 38″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×1600 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| — | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte M27F or LG 38CB99-W better?
Gigabyte M27F and LG 38CB99-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59. Resolution: LG 38CB99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27F leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte M27F leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).