Gigabyte M27UA vs MSI MAG 32CQ6F
Gigabyte M27UA
27″ · 3840×2160 · 160 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 32CQ6F
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAGigabyte M27UA and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76.
- Resolution: Gigabyte M27UA leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 160 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 5 ms).
Gigabyte M27UA
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 32CQ6F
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte M27UA | MSI MAG 32CQ6F | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 76 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 160 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $450 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte M27UA or MSI MAG 32CQ6F better?
Gigabyte M27UA and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76. Resolution: Gigabyte M27UA leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 160 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 160 Hz).