Monitors / Comparison

Gigabyte M28U Arm Edition vs MSI MAG 255PXF

Monitor · Gigabyte

Gigabyte M28U Arm Edition

28″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 80.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate62
Resolution100
Panel80
Response time90
VS
Monitor · MSI

MSI MAG 255PXF

24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 300 Hz · Rapid IPS
GEAR SCORE 79.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate91
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time97
Verdict

Gigabyte M28U Arm Edition and MSI MAG 255PXF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79.

  • Resolution: Gigabyte M28U Arm Edition leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
  • Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (300 Hz vs 144 Hz).
  • Response time: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Pick this

Gigabyte M28U Arm Edition

If you care most about resolution.

Pick this

MSI MAG 255PXF

If you care most about refresh rate, response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Gigabyte M28U Arm EditionMSI MAG 255PXF
80Gear score79
28″Screen size24.5″
3840×2160Resolution1920×1080
144 HzRefresh rate300 Hz
IPSPanelRapid IPS
1 msResponse time0.5 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Gigabyte M28U Arm Edition or MSI MAG 255PXF better?

Gigabyte M28U Arm Edition and MSI MAG 255PXF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 80 and 79. Resolution: Gigabyte M28U Arm Edition leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (300 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255PXF leads (300 Hz vs 144 Hz).