Gigabyte M32U vs MSI MAG 255F X24
Gigabyte M32U
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 255F X24
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · Rapid IPSGigabyte M32U and MSI MAG 255F X24 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 77.
- Resolution: Gigabyte M32U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Gigabyte M32U
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255F X24
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte M32U | MSI MAG 255F X24 | |
|---|---|---|
| 78 | Gear score | 77 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Rapid IPS |
| — | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $730 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte M32U or MSI MAG 255F X24 better?
Gigabyte M32U and MSI MAG 255F X24 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 78 and 77. Resolution: Gigabyte M32U leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F X24 leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).