Gigabyte M34WQ vs MSI MAG 255F E20
Gigabyte M34WQ
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI MAG 255F E20
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · Rapid IPSGigabyte M34WQ and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Resolution: Gigabyte M34WQ leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Gigabyte M34WQ
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 255F E20
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Gigabyte M34WQ | MSI MAG 255F E20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 24.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Rapid IPS |
| — | Response time | 0.5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Gigabyte M34WQ or MSI MAG 255F E20 better?
Gigabyte M34WQ and MSI MAG 255F E20 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Resolution: Gigabyte M34WQ leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 255F E20 leads (200 Hz vs 144 Hz).