Monitors / Comparison

HP ProDisplay P203 vs LG W1943SE-PF

Monitor · HP

HP ProDisplay P203

20″ · 1600×900 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 30.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution36
Panel50
VS
Monitor · LG

LG W1943SE-PF

19″ · 1366×768 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 29.0 / 100Entry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Panel50
Response time50
Verdict

HP ProDisplay P203 and LG W1943SE-PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 30 and 29.

  • Resolution: HP ProDisplay P203 leads (1600×900 vs 1366×768).
Pick this

HP ProDisplay P203

If you care most about resolution.

Spec-by-spec comparison

HP ProDisplay P203LG W1943SE-PF
30Gear score29
20″Screen size19″
1600×900Resolution1366×768
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
TNPanelTN
—Response time5 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is HP ProDisplay P203 or LG W1943SE-PF better?

HP ProDisplay P203 and LG W1943SE-PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 30 and 29. Resolution: HP ProDisplay P203 leads (1600×900 vs 1366×768).