iiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1 vs LG 25UM58-P
iiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1
25″ · 1920×1200 · 75 Hz · IPSLG 25UM58-P
25″ · 2560×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSiiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1 and LG 25UM58-P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50.
- Resolution: LG 25UM58-P leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1200).
- Response time: iiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
iiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1
If you care most about response time.
LG 25UM58-P
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| iiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1 | LG 25UM58-P | |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | Gear score | 50 |
| 25″ | Screen size | 25″ |
| 1920×1200 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is iiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1 or LG 25UM58-P better?
iiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1 and LG 25UM58-P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50. Resolution: LG 25UM58-P leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1200). Response time: iiyama ProLite XUB2595WSU-B1 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).