iiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1 vs LG 38CB99-W
iiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1
34″ · 3440×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSLG 38CB99-W
38″ · 3840×1600 · 75 Hz · IPSiiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1 and LG 38CB99-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59.
- Resolution: LG 38CB99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 3440×1440).
- Response time: iiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
iiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1
If you care most about response time.
LG 38CB99-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| iiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1 | LG 38CB99-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 59 | Gear score | 59 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 38″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×1600 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is iiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1 or LG 38CB99-W better?
iiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1 and LG 38CB99-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59. Resolution: LG 38CB99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 3440×1440). Response time: iiyama XUB3493WQSU-B1 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).