KTC A32Q8 vs LG 24MR400-B
LG 24MR400-B
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · IPSKTC A32Q8 and LG 24MR400-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54.
- Resolution: KTC A32Q8 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 24MR400-B leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
KTC A32Q8
If you care most about resolution.
LG 24MR400-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| KTC A32Q8 | LG 24MR400-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 54 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $250 | Estimated price | ≈ $96 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is KTC A32Q8 or LG 24MR400-B better?
KTC A32Q8 and LG 24MR400-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 54. Resolution: KTC A32Q8 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG 24MR400-B leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 24MR400-B leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: KTC A32Q8 ≈ $250, LG 24MR400-B ≈ $96. Current prices vary by store.