Monitors / Comparison

Lenovo 60CBMAR6US vs Samsung S32E590C

Monitor · Lenovo

Lenovo 60CBMAR6US

21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 43.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time37
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung S32E590C

31.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 42.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict

Lenovo 60CBMAR6US and Samsung S32E590C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 43 and 42.

  • Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 7 ms).
Pick this

Samsung S32E590C

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Lenovo 60CBMAR6USSamsung S32E590C
43Gear score42
21.5″Screen size31.5″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
IPSPanelVA
7 msResponse time4 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Lenovo 60CBMAR6US or Samsung S32E590C better?

Lenovo 60CBMAR6US and Samsung S32E590C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 43 and 42. Response time: Samsung S32E590C leads (4 ms vs 7 ms).

Similar comparisons

Lenovo 60CBMAR6US vs AOC 24B1XHLenovo 60CBMAR6US vs AOC 24B1XHSLenovo 60CBMAR6US vs AOC P2370SDLenovo 60CBMAR6US vs Dell S2240LLenovo 60CBMAR6US vs Dell S2240MSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS ML239HSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS MX239HSamsung S32E590C vs ASUS MX279HSamsung S32E590C vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung S32E590C vs BenQ BL2483