Monitors / Comparison
LG 22EA63T-P vs LG W2753VC-PF
Monitor · LG
LG 22EA63T-P
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · IPS · 2013Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel80
Response time50
Recency20
VS
Monitor · LG
LG W2753VC-PF
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time78
Verdict
LG 22EA63T-P and LG W2753VC-PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41.
- Response time: LG W2753VC-PF leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
LG W2753VC-PF
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 22EA63T-P | LG W2753VC-PF | |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | Gear score | 41 |
| 21.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| 2013 | Release year | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 22EA63T-P or LG W2753VC-PF better?
LG 22EA63T-P and LG W2753VC-PF are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41. Response time: LG W2753VC-PF leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).