LG 24GL600F-B vs LG 40BP95C-W
LG 24GL600F-B
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNLG 40BP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · Nano IPSLG 24GL600F-B and LG 40BP95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60.
- Resolution: LG 40BP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 24GL600F-B leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: LG 24GL600F-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 24GL600F-B
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
LG 40BP95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 24GL600F-B | LG 40BP95C-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 60 |
| 23.6″ | Screen size | 39.7″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 5120×2160 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 72 Hz |
| TN | Panel | Nano IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,470 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 24GL600F-B or LG 40BP95C-W better?
LG 24GL600F-B and LG 40BP95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60. Resolution: LG 40BP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG 24GL600F-B leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: LG 24GL600F-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 24GL600F-B leads (144 Hz vs 72 Hz).