LG 24GQ50F-B vs Philips 40B1U6903CH
LG 24GQ50F-B
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VAPhilips 40B1U6903CH
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 75 Hz · IPSLG 24GQ50F-B and Philips 40B1U6903CH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 62 and 62.
- Resolution: Philips 40B1U6903CH leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 24GQ50F-B leads (165 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 40B1U6903CH leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 24GQ50F-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 40B1U6903CH
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 24GQ50F-B | Philips 40B1U6903CH | |
|---|---|---|
| 62 | Gear score | 62 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 39.7″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 5120×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $195 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 24GQ50F-B or Philips 40B1U6903CH better?
LG 24GQ50F-B and Philips 40B1U6903CH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 62 and 62. Resolution: Philips 40B1U6903CH leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG 24GQ50F-B leads (165 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: Philips 40B1U6903CH leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 24GQ50F-B leads (165 Hz vs 75 Hz).