LG 25UM56-P vs LG 27BK400H-B
LG 25UM56-P
25″ · 2560×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSLG 27BK400H-B
27″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · TNLG 25UM56-P and LG 27BK400H-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 45.
- Resolution: LG 25UM56-P leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 27BK400H-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG 27BK400H-B leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 25UM56-P
If you care most about resolution.
LG 27BK400H-B
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 25UM56-P | LG 27BK400H-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Gear score | 45 |
| 25″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $200 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 25UM56-P or LG 27BK400H-B better?
LG 25UM56-P and LG 27BK400H-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 45. Resolution: LG 25UM56-P leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG 27BK400H-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG 27BK400H-B leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 27BK400H-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).