LG 26WQ500-B vs Philips 288P6LJEB
LG 26WQ500-B
25.7″ · 2560×1080 · 75 Hz · IPSPhilips 288P6LJEB
28″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · TNLG 26WQ500-B and Philips 288P6LJEB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50.
- Resolution: Philips 288P6LJEB leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 26WQ500-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
LG 26WQ500-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 288P6LJEB
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 26WQ500-B | Philips 288P6LJEB | |
|---|---|---|
| 50 | Gear score | 50 |
| 25.7″ | Screen size | 28″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $250 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 26WQ500-B or Philips 288P6LJEB better?
LG 26WQ500-B and Philips 288P6LJEB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 50 and 50. Resolution: Philips 288P6LJEB leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: LG 26WQ500-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 26WQ500-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).