LG 27BK400H-B vs LG 29EA93-P
LG 27BK400H-B
27″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · TNLG 29EA93-P
29″ · 2560×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSLG 27BK400H-B and LG 29EA93-P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46.
- Resolution: LG 29EA93-P leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 27BK400H-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG 27BK400H-B leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 27BK400H-B
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
LG 29EA93-P
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 27BK400H-B | LG 29EA93-P | |
|---|---|---|
| 45 | Gear score | 46 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 29″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 27BK400H-B or LG 29EA93-P better?
LG 27BK400H-B and LG 29EA93-P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 45 and 46. Resolution: LG 29EA93-P leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG 27BK400H-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG 27BK400H-B leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 27BK400H-B leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).