LG 27UK670-B vs LG 40BP95C-W
LG 27UK670-B
27″ · 3840×2160 · 75 Hz · IPSLG 40BP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · Nano IPSLG 27UK670-B and LG 40BP95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60.
- Resolution: LG 40BP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3840×2160).
- Refresh rate: LG 27UK670-B leads (75 Hz vs 72 Hz).
LG 27UK670-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 40BP95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 27UK670-B | LG 40BP95C-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | Gear score | 60 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 39.7″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 72 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Nano IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,470 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 27UK670-B or LG 40BP95C-W better?
LG 27UK670-B and LG 40BP95C-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 61 and 60. Resolution: LG 40BP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3840×2160). Refresh rate: LG 27UK670-B leads (75 Hz vs 72 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 27UK670-B leads (75 Hz vs 72 Hz).