Monitors / Comparison

LG 32BK50Q-W vs Philips 328E9FJAB

Monitor · LG

LG 32BK50Q-W

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 53.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate25
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time30
VS
Monitor · Philips

Philips 328E9FJAB

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 53.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate25
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict

LG 32BK50Q-W and Philips 328E9FJAB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 53 and 53.

  • Response time: Philips 328E9FJAB leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this

Philips 328E9FJAB

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

LG 32BK50Q-WPhilips 328E9FJAB
53Gear score53
31.5″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
75 HzRefresh rate75 Hz
IPSPanelVA
8 msResponse time4 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is LG 32BK50Q-W or Philips 328E9FJAB better?

LG 32BK50Q-W and Philips 328E9FJAB are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 53 and 53. Response time: Philips 328E9FJAB leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).

Similar comparisons

LG 32BK50Q-W vs ASUS PB277QLG 32BK50Q-W vs ASUS PB328QLG 32BK50Q-W vs BenQ GW2765HTLG 32BK50Q-W vs BenQ PD2700QLG 32BK50Q-W vs MSI PRO MP271QPPhilips 328E9FJAB vs ASUS PB277QPhilips 328E9FJAB vs ASUS PB328QPhilips 328E9FJAB vs BenQ GW2765HTPhilips 328E9FJAB vs BenQ PD2700QPhilips 328E9FJAB vs MSI PRO MP271QP