Monitors / Comparison
LG 32UK50T-W vs LG 34WP88CP-B
Monitor · LG
LG 32UK50T-W
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAGood
Refresh rate15
Resolution100
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · LG
LG 34WP88CP-B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution88
Panel80
Response time50
Verdict
LG 32UK50T-W and LG 34WP88CP-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54.
- Resolution: LG 32UK50T-W leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Response time: LG 32UK50T-W leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
LG 32UK50T-W
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 32UK50T-W | LG 34WP88CP-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 54 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 32UK50T-W or LG 34WP88CP-B better?
LG 32UK50T-W and LG 34WP88CP-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54. Resolution: LG 32UK50T-W leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Response time: LG 32UK50T-W leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).