LG 34UM58-P vs Sceptre E205W-16003S
Sceptre E205W-16003S
19.5″ · 1600×900 · 75 Hz · TNLG 34UM58-P and Sceptre E205W-16003S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 37 and 38.
- Resolution: LG 34UM58-P leads (2560×1080 vs 1600×900).
- Refresh rate: Sceptre E205W-16003S leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Sceptre E205W-16003S leads (3.5 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 34UM58-P
If you care most about resolution.
Sceptre E205W-16003S
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34UM58-P | Sceptre E205W-16003S | |
|---|---|---|
| 37 | Gear score | 38 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 19.5″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1600×900 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| — | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 3.5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $110 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34UM58-P or Sceptre E205W-16003S better?
LG 34UM58-P and Sceptre E205W-16003S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 37 and 38. Resolution: LG 34UM58-P leads (2560×1080 vs 1600×900). Refresh rate: Sceptre E205W-16003S leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Sceptre E205W-16003S leads (3.5 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Sceptre E205W-16003S leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).