LG 34WP88CP-B vs LG 43UN700T-B
LG 34WP88CP-B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSLG 43UN700T-B
43″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSLG 34WP88CP-B and LG 43UN700T-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 55.
- Resolution: LG 43UN700T-B leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Response time: LG 34WP88CP-B leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
LG 34WP88CP-B
If you care most about response time.
LG 43UN700T-B
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34WP88CP-B | LG 43UN700T-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 55 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 43″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $700 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34WP88CP-B or LG 43UN700T-B better?
LG 34WP88CP-B and LG 43UN700T-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 55. Resolution: LG 43UN700T-B leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Response time: LG 34WP88CP-B leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).