LG 34WQ60C-B vs Philips 27E1N1300AE/00
LG 34WQ60C-B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSPhilips 27E1N1300AE/00
27″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · IPSLG 34WQ60C-B and Philips 27E1N1300AE/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 55.
- Resolution: LG 34WQ60C-B leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27E1N1300AE/00 leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
LG 34WQ60C-B
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27E1N1300AE/00
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34WQ60C-B | Philips 27E1N1300AE/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 55 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $300 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34WQ60C-B or Philips 27E1N1300AE/00 better?
LG 34WQ60C-B and Philips 27E1N1300AE/00 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 55. Resolution: LG 34WQ60C-B leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27E1N1300AE/00 leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27E1N1300AE/00 leads (100 Hz vs 60 Hz).