LG 34WQ60C-B vs Philips 439P1
LG 34WQ60C-B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSPhilips 439P1
42.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VALG 34WQ60C-B and Philips 439P1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 55.
- Resolution: Philips 439P1 leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Response time: Philips 439P1 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Philips 439P1
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34WQ60C-B | Philips 439P1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 55 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 42.5″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $300 | Estimated price | ≈ $600 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34WQ60C-B or Philips 439P1 better?
LG 34WQ60C-B and Philips 439P1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 55. Resolution: Philips 439P1 leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Response time: Philips 439P1 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: LG 34WQ60C-B ≈ $300, Philips 439P1 ≈ $600. Current prices vary by store.