LG 34WQ65X-W vs Planar PXN2480MW-WH
LG 34WQ65X-W
34″ · 2560×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSPlanar PXN2480MW-WH
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 76 Hz · IPSLG 34WQ65X-W and Planar PXN2480MW-WH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 47.
- Resolution: LG 34WQ65X-W leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Planar PXN2480MW-WH leads (76 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG 34WQ65X-W leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
LG 34WQ65X-W
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Planar PXN2480MW-WH
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34WQ65X-W | Planar PXN2480MW-WH | |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Gear score | 47 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 76 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $253 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34WQ65X-W or Planar PXN2480MW-WH better?
LG 34WQ65X-W and Planar PXN2480MW-WH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 47. Resolution: LG 34WQ65X-W leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Planar PXN2480MW-WH leads (76 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG 34WQ65X-W leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Planar PXN2480MW-WH leads (76 Hz vs 60 Hz).