LG 34WQ65X-W vs Sceptre E248W-19203S
LG 34WQ65X-W
34″ · 2560×1080 · 60 Hz · IPSSceptre E248W-19203S
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 75 Hz · VALG 34WQ65X-W and Sceptre E248W-19203S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 47.
- Resolution: LG 34WQ65X-W leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Sceptre E248W-19203S leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Sceptre E248W-19203S leads (3.5 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 34WQ65X-W
If you care most about resolution.
Sceptre E248W-19203S
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34WQ65X-W | Sceptre E248W-19203S | |
|---|---|---|
| 46 | Gear score | 47 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 2560×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 3.5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $89 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34WQ65X-W or Sceptre E248W-19203S better?
LG 34WQ65X-W and Sceptre E248W-19203S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 46 and 47. Resolution: LG 34WQ65X-W leads (2560×1080 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Sceptre E248W-19203S leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Sceptre E248W-19203S leads (3.5 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Sceptre E248W-19203S leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).