LG 34WR50QC-B vs LG 40WP95CP-W
LG 34WR50QC-B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VALG 40WP95CP-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSLG 34WR50QC-B and LG 40WP95CP-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 60.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: LG 34WR50QC-B leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).
LG 34WR50QC-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 40WP95CP-W
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34WR50QC-B | LG 40WP95CP-W | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 60 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 39.7″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 5120×2160 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 72 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34WR50QC-B or LG 40WP95CP-W better?
LG 34WR50QC-B and LG 40WP95CP-W are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 60. Resolution: LG 40WP95CP-W leads (5120×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: LG 34WR50QC-B leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 34WR50QC-B leads (100 Hz vs 72 Hz).