LG 34WR50QC-B vs Sceptre U279W-4000RK
LG 34WR50QC-B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 100 Hz · VASceptre U279W-4000RK
26.9″ · 3840×2160 · 70 Hz · IPSLG 34WR50QC-B and Sceptre U279W-4000RK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 60.
- Resolution: Sceptre U279W-4000RK leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: LG 34WR50QC-B leads (100 Hz vs 70 Hz).
LG 34WR50QC-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Sceptre U279W-4000RK
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 34WR50QC-B | Sceptre U279W-4000RK | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 60 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 26.9″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 70 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 34WR50QC-B or Sceptre U279W-4000RK better?
LG 34WR50QC-B and Sceptre U279W-4000RK are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 60. Resolution: Sceptre U279W-4000RK leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: LG 34WR50QC-B leads (100 Hz vs 70 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 34WR50QC-B leads (100 Hz vs 70 Hz).