LG 38CB99-W vs Monoprice 40775
LG 38CB99-W
38″ · 3840×1600 · 75 Hz · IPSMonoprice 40775
23.6″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · VALG 38CB99-W and Monoprice 40775 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59.
- Resolution: LG 38CB99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Monoprice 40775 leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: LG 38CB99-W leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
LG 38CB99-W
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Monoprice 40775
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 38CB99-W | Monoprice 40775 | |
|---|---|---|
| 59 | Gear score | 59 |
| 38″ | Screen size | 23.6″ |
| 3840×1600 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 6 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 38CB99-W or Monoprice 40775 better?
LG 38CB99-W and Monoprice 40775 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59. Resolution: LG 38CB99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Monoprice 40775 leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: LG 38CB99-W leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Monoprice 40775 leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).