LG 38GN95B-B vs Titan Army C32C1S
LG 38GN95B-B
37.5″ · 3840×1600 · 160 Hz · IPSTitan Army C32C1S
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · VALG 38GN95B-B and Titan Army C32C1S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: LG 38GN95B-B leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Titan Army C32C1S leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz).
LG 38GN95B-B
If you care most about resolution.
Titan Army C32C1S
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 38GN95B-B | Titan Army C32C1S | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 37.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×1600 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 160 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $305 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 38GN95B-B or Titan Army C32C1S better?
LG 38GN95B-B and Titan Army C32C1S are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: LG 38GN95B-B leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Titan Army C32C1S leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Titan Army C32C1S leads (240 Hz vs 160 Hz).