LG 38GN95B-B vs ViewSonic XG320U
LG 38GN95B-B
37.5″ · 3840×1600 · 160 Hz · IPSViewSonic XG320U
32″ · 3840×2160 · 150 Hz · IPSLG 38GN95B-B and ViewSonic XG320U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79.
- Resolution: ViewSonic XG320U leads (3840×2160 vs 3840×1600).
- Refresh rate: LG 38GN95B-B leads (160 Hz vs 150 Hz).
LG 38GN95B-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
ViewSonic XG320U
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 38GN95B-B | ViewSonic XG320U | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 79 |
| 37.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 3840×1600 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 160 Hz | Refresh rate | 150 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 38GN95B-B or ViewSonic XG320U better?
LG 38GN95B-B and ViewSonic XG320U are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 79. Resolution: ViewSonic XG320U leads (3840×2160 vs 3840×1600). Refresh rate: LG 38GN95B-B leads (160 Hz vs 150 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 38GN95B-B leads (160 Hz vs 150 Hz).