LG 38UC99-W vs QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel
LG 38UC99-W
37.5″ · 3840×1600 · 75 Hz · IPSQNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel
24″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · TNLG 38UC99-W and QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59.
- Resolution: LG 38UC99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 38UC99-W
If you care most about resolution.
QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 38UC99-W | QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel | |
|---|---|---|
| 59 | Gear score | 59 |
| 37.5″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 3840×1600 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| ≈ $1,420 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 38UC99-W or QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel better?
LG 38UC99-W and QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59. Resolution: LG 38UC99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel leads (2 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: QNIX QX2414 LED 144 MULTI Perfect Pixel leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).