LG 38UC99-W vs Rampage Crux CR24R100
LG 38UC99-W
37.5″ · 3840×1600 · 75 Hz · IPSRampage Crux CR24R100
24″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · IPSLG 38UC99-W and Rampage Crux CR24R100 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59.
- Resolution: LG 38UC99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Rampage Crux CR24R100 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: Rampage Crux CR24R100 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 38UC99-W
If you care most about resolution.
Rampage Crux CR24R100
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 38UC99-W | Rampage Crux CR24R100 | |
|---|---|---|
| 59 | Gear score | 59 |
| 37.5″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 3840×1600 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $1,420 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 38UC99-W or Rampage Crux CR24R100 better?
LG 38UC99-W and Rampage Crux CR24R100 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59. Resolution: LG 38UC99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Rampage Crux CR24R100 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: Rampage Crux CR24R100 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Rampage Crux CR24R100 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).