LG 38UC99-W vs VIOTEK GN27C2
LG 38UC99-W
37.5″ · 3840×1600 · 75 Hz · IPSVIOTEK GN27C2
27″ · 1920×1080 · 144 Hz · VALG 38UC99-W and VIOTEK GN27C2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59.
- Resolution: LG 38UC99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN27C2 leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: LG 38UC99-W leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
LG 38UC99-W
If you care most about resolution, response time.
VIOTEK GN27C2
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 38UC99-W | VIOTEK GN27C2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 59 | Gear score | 59 |
| 37.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×1600 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 6 ms |
| ≈ $1,420 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 38UC99-W or VIOTEK GN27C2 better?
LG 38UC99-W and VIOTEK GN27C2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 59 and 59. Resolution: LG 38UC99-W leads (3840×1600 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN27C2 leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: LG 38UC99-W leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: VIOTEK GN27C2 leads (144 Hz vs 75 Hz).