LG 38WR85QC-W vs MSI MAG 32CQ6F
LG 38WR85QC-W
37.5″ · 3840×1600 · 144 Hz · Nano IPSMSI MAG 32CQ6F
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VALG 38WR85QC-W and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76.
- Resolution: LG 38WR85QC-W leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
LG 38WR85QC-W
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 32CQ6F
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 38WR85QC-W | MSI MAG 32CQ6F | |
|---|---|---|
| 77 | Gear score | 76 |
| 37.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×1600 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| Nano IPS | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $1,100 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 38WR85QC-W or MSI MAG 32CQ6F better?
LG 38WR85QC-W and MSI MAG 32CQ6F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 77 and 76. Resolution: LG 38WR85QC-W leads (3840×1600 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (0.5 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 32CQ6F leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).